Generative AI

Strategy

Mitigating Security Risks of ChatGPT and other LLMs

AI tools like ChatGPT revolutionize tech interaction but pose risks like security breaches and bias. Understanding these risks is crucial, especially in generative model adoption, focusing on input-output stages for effective mitigation.

Written by
Ardonis Shalaj
Published on
April 29, 2024
Estim. Reading Time
8 min.
AI tools like ChatGPT revolutionize tech interaction but pose risks like security breaches and bias. Understanding these risks is crucial, especially in generative model adoption, focusing on input-output stages for effective mitigation.
In the rapidly evolving field of artificial intelligence, tools like ChatGPT, Claude3, Gemini and others have revolutionized how we interact with technology and Artificial Intelligence, offering unprecedented opportunities for innovation. However, with great power comes great responsibility. The implementation of AI, particularly generative models like ChatGPT, introduces several risks ranging from security breaches and data leakage to ethical dilemmas around privacy and bias. It's crucial for businesses and individuals to understand these risks and how to mitigate them effectively. The aim of this blog is to provide a gobal review of the risks and mitigations involved in adopting generative models.
It is well known that the interaction of a generative model takes place in two stages. That is, input and output. We communicate with the model by asking it what we want it to do. We even go so far as to provide context and other data to ensure that the model performs in the best possible way. This input of data and instructions is called input. On the basis of the data and instructions given and the training the model has undergone, it will provide us with the most probative answers. This is called the model's output. It's on these two levels of interaction, then, that we're going to look at risks and mitigations.

Input provided to the AI system

Input Risks

Input risks refer to the concerns around the data users provide to AI systems. These risks include:
  • Security and Data Leakage: Sensitive information entered might be incorporated into shared outputs, leading to potential breaches.
  • Confidentiality and Liability: Sharing confidential data, intentionally or accidentally, may violate agreements, leading to reputational damage and legal issues.
  • Privacy and Compliance: Inputting personal data into AI models raises questions about compliance with international privacy laws and the potential for data misuse.
These risks can be all the more problematic if the model uses the data entered for its future retraining.

Mitigating Input Risks

To address these input concerns, several strategies can be employed:
  1. Use AI through an Enterprise Service Provider: This approach can help ensure that sensitive data is not stored unnecessarily and is protected against unauthorized access. For example, OpenAI do not store the data in the entreprise level but scan sometime for abuses.
  2. Anonymize Sensitive Data: Before feeding data into AI systems, anonymizing it can safeguard against accidental disclosure.
  3. Self-Hosting AI Models: For those seeking maximum control over their data, hosting AI models on personal or private cloud servers can provide enhanced security.

Output Provided by the AI system

Output Risks

The output from AI models also presents risks and necessitate a keen awareness of several key risks:
  1. Intellectual Property Concerns: When AI generates content, the resulting ownership can be convoluted, especially if the system integrates copyrighted data from various inputs. This patchwork creation process could lead to potential copyright infringement, presenting a significant challenge for creators and users alike.
  2. Compliance with Open Source Licenses: AI systems often rely on open-source communities, integrating libraries and code snippets into their products. However, this practice is not free from review, as it may violate certain licenses, leading to serious legal complications for unsuspecting developers.
  3. Limitations on AI Development: The terms of service governing some AI platforms can be restrictive, limiting their use for the development of other AI systems. Such constraints could act as a barrier to innovation and slow the progress of AI technologies, raising a challenge for developers keen to push back the boundaries of what is possible.

Addressing Output Risks

Understanding these risks is just the first step; we must actively engage in practices that protect intellectual property, respect licensing agreements, and navigate development limitations. Here's how we can approach these challenges:
  • Vigilant Monitoring of AI Outputs: Keeping a close eye on the outputs generated by AI to ensure they do not infringe on existing copyrights or violate licensing agreements.
  • Legal and Ethical AI Frameworks: Establishing robust legal and ethical frameworks that guide the use of AI outputs, particularly when dealing with open-source components.
  • Clear Development Policies: Writing terms of service that foster innovation, enabling developers to use AI tools in a way that encourages growth and progress in this field.

Conclusion

A proactive and informed approach is essential to managing the risks associated with ChatGPT and other generative AI technologies. By understanding and mitigating potential entry and output risks, users and developers can harness the power of AI responsibly, opening the way to a future where AI enhances our digital experiences without compromising security or privacy.

Send us an email to check availability

contact@genwise.agency

Company

Contact

Manhattan Center
Avenue du Boulevard 21, 5th Floor
1210 Saint-Josse-ten-Noode
Brussels, Belgium

Connect With Us